The threat of a devastating electromagnetic pulse attack on the United States is increasing just as American infrastructure has become more vulnerable, according to a new report.

“Our nation has further increased its reliance on technologies that depend upon the availability of electricity and digital electronics to manage and monitor the network of systems that deliver our basic goods and services,” said the report from the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA).

As a result, an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack “could severely disrupt everything we take for granted, from food and water distribution to functioning sewer, medical, healthcare and banking systems.”

EMP events can be generated by natural causes, such as a solar storm, or an intentional attack through a cyber assault or the detonation of a nuclear weapon above earth’s atmosphere. Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are all said to be developing EMP weapon technology.

Some experts have suggested that an EMP assault “could kill 9 of 10 Americans through starvation, disease, and societal collapse.”

The JINSA task force, which includes former senior government and military officials, issued several recommendations to improve the nation’s defenses against an EMP attack, such as building EMP protection into new smart grids, declaring unequivocally how the United States would respond to an attack, and forming more public-private partnerships to tackle the problem.

“Despite this growing danger, mitigating the likelihood and consequences of such an attack could be accomplished with relatively modest investments in infrastructure over the near to medium term, especially when compared to the scale of losses should we continue to do nothing,” the report said.

Click here to read in The Washington Free Beacon

The post JINSA EMP Task Force Report in the Washington Free Beacon appeared first on JINSA.

Senate Homeland Security Chairman Ron Johnson said this afternoon that he’s happy to use his committee as a vehicle to hammer on threats to the electric grid posed by natural and man-made electromagnetic disruption.

“These are very real threats that we’re not addressing right now,” the Wisconsin Republican said at an event organized on Capitol Hill by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs to discuss EMP threats. Utilities, Johnson said, are “regulated enough but this is a threat that they’ve gotta recognize that this is a threat.”

Johnson offered up his panel to press the issue with more hearings, noting how a severe solar storm or a small nuclear weapon detonated in the atmosphere could
fry large sections of the grid. The White House released a strategy for solar storms recently. Johnson’s also “happy” to propose legislation on the subject and he won’t get hung up looking for how to pay for it either.

“As a fiscal conservative, I could care less how we’re going to pay for it. I’m not gonna even look for a pay-for,” Johnson said, adding that “we’ll pick up the whole tab. I don’t require cost-sharing.”
He added: “I’m happy to act as a general contractor. I’m happy to put up with the scorn and the ridicule, being accused of being Chicken Little.”

The stakes, Johnson said, were clear in his mind. “We’re going to be looking at Mad Max, right? … If we don’t have electricity, everything shuts down.”

The post JINSA EMP Task Force in Politico appeared first on JINSA.

Ongoing crises make it difficult for policymakers to devote sufficient attention to electromagnetic threats, which are less prominent but potentially catastrophic. Events that reflect our growing vulnerability to these threats often slip quickly from the front page, as did the cyberattack against Sony Pictures. Others, such as solar storms across Alaska in March and the accidental power station explosion in April that left Washington, D.C. in the dark, go mostly unnoticed. And even events that dominate headlines, like the Iran nuclear agreement, don’t tell the whole story about electromagnetic threats. As a nuclear threshold state, Iran may quickly race to build a bomb that could be used to conduct a devastating electromagnetic attack against the United States.

Our nation is increasingly reliant on technology to manage and monitor the network of systems that deliver our basic goods and services, and our system for generating and distributing electricity is the core of this network. A failure here could cascade across other vital national infrastructures, severely disrupting everything we take for granted, from food and water to cell service and sewer systems. However, little has been done to take the necessary steps to protect our infrastructures, thus our vulnerability only continues to increase. As this dangerous condition grows, the devastation that would follow such an attack also multiplies, making electromagnetic attacks an increasingly attractive option to U.S. adversaries. This is compounded by the fact that nuclear proliferation has resulted in new capabilities for those who may be more inclined to exploit our vulnerabilities to electromagnetic attack, particularly rogue regimes like Iran and North Korea.

Of special concern are natural events and man-made electromagnetic threats that expose and exploit weaknesses based on the very strengths of our modern digital society. Solar geomagnetic storms create immediate and intense energy fields that may disrupt electrical and microelectronic systems, potentially on a continental scale. Cyberattacks, intentional electromagnetic interference weapons and high-altitude EMP attacks produced by the detonation of a nuclear device above the atmosphere could cripple our critical infrastructure and wreak havoc on the lives of millions of Americans.

Such threats are often dismissed as unlikely or a relic from the Cold War. They are not. Solar storms are not infrequent, making it only a matter of time until one impacts our critical infrastructure. And unlike natural phenomena, there is no reliable methodology for quantifying the likelihood of an EMP attack. Nevertheless, it is possible to identify developments that increase our adversaries’ capacity and incentive to conduct an electromagnetic attack. These include the proliferation of ballistic missiles – especially in the hands of hostile actors like Iran and North Korea – and the growing perception of U.S. vulnerabilities to such attacks.

While policymakers have known of these vulnerabilities for years, little has been done to strengthen our infrastructure and build societal resiliency against the full range of electromagnetic threats. In the past, there seemed to be good reasons to put off action: The likelihood of attack appeared small, the cost enormous. Today, new developments make addressing this threat both more urgent and more feasible.

First, the threat spectrum has grown. While this presents a significant challenge, it is also an opportunity. An integrated approach is needed against all threats that could jeopardize the functioning of critical infrastructure, especially the electric grid. This will yield economies of scale that can be used to advantage in hardening selected assets to address multiple dangers.

Second, opportunities for action have grown. The U.S. electric grid is not static. Elements are constantly being replaced and upgraded. This represents a major opportunity to reduce vulnerabilities, hardening the electric grid and electronic infrastructures and executing smart shutdowns of the power grid on warning. Both enhancements would require smart reconstitution of the grid after an electromagnetic event. And all of these steps will require prioritization, improved planning, modeling and exercises.

With the proper standards in place, the cost of hardening equipment to increase resilience could be as little as 3 percent more than existing capital investment for electric grid upgrades. Those existing annual investments run around $100 billion, so the added cost would be on the order of $1-3 billion per year.

Third, new public-private partnerships are possible. The perennial challenge of critical infrastructure protection stems in part from the divide between those responsible for keeping Americans safe (the government) and those who own and control the systems that need protection (private entities). Significant progress has been made in thinking through these relationships as part of an effort to better protect against cyber and terrorist threats. But new laws and insurance mechanisms for improving these partnerships need to be broadened to address electromagnetic threats.

Fourth, an improved approach to deterrence is needed. Little attention has been devoted to the role of deterrence in regards to man-made electromagnetic threats, perhaps because of the assumption that nuclear deterrence policies from the Cold War are sufficient. With the proliferation of nuclear actors and new potential electromagnetic threat vectors, serious thought should now be given to electromagnetic-specific deterrence.

These recommendations are not exhaustive, but by taking practical steps to address our most pressing areas for improvement, the U.S. can begin devising a broad set of balanced solutions to better protect the critical infrastructure upon which our way of life depends.[

Dr. Bryan Gabbard is the executive vice president of the Defense Group Inc. and a former member of numerous Defense Science Boards and other Task Forces on nuclear matters. Ambassador Robert Joseph is a former under secretary of state for Arms Control and International Security. They are the co-chairs of a new EMP Task Force at JINSA’s Gemunder Center for Defense and Strategy.

Click here to read the op-ed in U.S. News and World Report

The post Gemunder Center EMP Task Force Co-Chairs Author Op-ed in U.S. News and World Report appeared first on JINSA.

Gemunder Center EMP Task Force Comments Submitted to FERC Regarding Reliability Standard for Transmission System Planned Performance for Geomagnetic Disturbance Events
July 27, 2015

The post EMP Task Force FERC Docket Comments appeared first on JINSA.

Lloyd’s City Risk Index 2015-2025

U.K. Government’s Space Weather Preparedness Strategy

The post Further References appeared first on JINSA.