Fault Line: The Suwayda Crisis and Its Implications For Syria’s Future

The July 2025 Suwayda crisis represents a critical test for Syria’s transitional government, with direct implications for U.S. interests and Israeli security. What began as an allegedly localized dispute between Bedouin tribal gunmen and a Druze merchant—though Druze and Israeli sources suggest direct coordination from Damascus—rapidly escalated into sectarian clashes that killed at least 1,000 individuals, including an American citizen, displaced 128,000 people, and drew Israeli military intervention. The violence laid bare deep tensions between Syria’s new government in Damascus—led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa and rooted in the former jihadist organization Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)—and the country’s Druze community, which is wary of the regime due to HTS’s history of targeting religious minorities.

Treatment of minorities is an important bellwether of the new regime’s intention—indeed, such intentions are unclear—and ability to transform Syria from the Iranian proxy and jihadist breeding ground it has been into a stable, constructive regional player. This requires threading the needle between creating a strong enough Syrian government to bring myriad armed factions under control, expel foreign jihadists, prevent Iran’s resurgence, and conduct counterterrorist operations against ISIS all without being so strong that it tramples on the rights of minorities or threatens Syria’s neighbors, particularly Israel.

The United States should act decisively to prevent further bloodshed in Suwayda, surge humanitarian assistance to the area, and demand accountability from those that committed the violence. Statements by U.S. officials stressing centralization of authority in Damascus might have unintentionally emboldened the Sharaa regime, or at least some of its security forces, to subjugate violently the Druze and other minority groups, leading to awful clashes and atrocities. Washington should take this, and other recent regime-connected violence against minorities, as an indication that rather than merely accepting the Sharaa government or pressing for a centralized Syria it must prioritize its interests in a peaceful Syria by working closely with Israel, European, and Arab partners to ensure that any post-Assad political order, whatever it looks like, respects minority rights avoids descending into the sectarianism of the past.

If the Druze are not safe in the new Syria, it is unlikely that the United States or Israel will be safe from the new highly complex Syria.

Click here to read the report.

Report Authors
Blaise Misztal
Vice President for Policy
Jonah Brody
Policy Analyst
Sarah Havdala
Policy Analyst